It’s taken a while, but it seems that business schools are finally placing value in GMAT’s integrated reasoning (IR) section, a separate part of the admissions exam that was added a little over three years ago.
Last year, a majority of admissions officers (60%) did not feel that the separate score achieved by MBA applicants on the IR section represented “an important part of their evaluation of a prospective student’s overall GMAT score” on the basis of a survey of admissions officers carried out by Kaplan Test Prep. This number was actually a fraction higher than the 57% who answered similarly in 2013, leading many to speculate whether the IR section may have been a failed change on the part of the GMAT’s governing body, GMAC.
However, the suggestion is that business schools may now have worked out a way to ascribe value to a section which asks test takers to evaluate information across charts, graphs and data tables, according to the results of Kaplan Test Prep’s latest survey for 2015. More than half (59%) of respondents from just over 200 US schools, as well as five from the UK, now say that the integrated reasoning score is at least ‘somewhat important’ to their evaluation of a candidate’s overall GMAT score.
“Now that MBA programs have an additional year’s worth of data on the integrated reasoning section and have become more familiar with what it measures, it’s understandable why more have decided that it should be an important part of how they evaluate an applicant’s overall GMAT score,” said Kaplan Test Prep’s executive director of pre-business and pre-graduate programs, Brian Carlidge.



Get closer to your dream programme
Your consent preferences have been set.
Time to start exploring.
Your account has been removed.
You can still browse the site or sign up again once you have parental consent.
Get closer to your dream programme